DeFi protocols ranked by security, audit history and on-chain transparency. Understand smart-contract and counterparty risk before you supply liquidity or bridge assets.
This ranking is not editorial opinion or a paid placement. Every DeFi protocol is scored 0–100 by the same published methodology across five weighted dimensions: regulatory compliance (30%), security (25%), operational reliability (20%), transparency (15%) and real user outcomes (10%). Collapsed, blacklisted, suspended and archived entities are excluded, and no DeFi protocol can pay to raise, hide or remove its position.
Read the full scoring methodology →Regulation, security and transparency shown are the underlying trust-score dimensions (0–100). Values are what Finawake measures from official and public data; “—” means not enough data yet.
| # | DeFi protocol | Trust | Regulation | Security | Transparency | Regulators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uniswap | 46 | 0 | 50 | 30 | — |
| 2 | Curve Finance | 46 | 0 | 50 | 30 | — |
| 3 | Compound | 46 | 0 | 50 | 30 | — |
| 4 | dYdX | 46 | 0 | 50 | 30 | — |
| 5 | Frax | 46 | 0 | 50 | 30 | — |
| 6 | EigenLayer | 46 | 0 | 50 | 30 | — |
| 7 | Synthetix | 44 | 0 | 50 | 30 | — |
| 8 | Rocket Pool | 44 | 0 | 50 | 30 | — |
| 9 | Aave | 36 | 0 | 50 | 30 | — |
| 10 | MakerDAO | 36 | 0 | 50 | 30 | — |
For full per-DeFi protocol detail — licenses, complaints, reviews and score history — open the individual profile from the list above.
Prioritise strong, tier-1 regulation and client-fund protection over bonuses or high leverage. A high regulatory and transparency score matters more than marketing.
Weigh operational reliability — execution, uptime and withdrawal track record — alongside costs. Check the operational dimension and real user outcomes on each profile.
Favour the highest regulatory and security scores, verified licenses and a clean enforcement history. Avoid unregulated or offshore-only entities.
Based on Finawake's trust methodology, Uniswap currently ranks highest among defi protocols with a trust score of 46/100. Rankings can change as new regulatory, security and user-outcome data arrives.
Each entity is scored 0–100 across five weighted dimensions — regulatory compliance (30%), security (25%), operational reliability (20%), transparency (15%) and real user outcomes (10%) — using the same published methodology, so rankings are comparable and independent.
Take the license number shown on the entity's Finawake page and search it directly in the relevant regulator's official register (for example the FCA, ASIC or SPK register). A license only counts as "verified" here when it exactly matches an active record in that official source.
The strongest signals are regulation by a reputable authority, protection of client funds (segregation and compensation schemes), a clean enforcement history, transparent fees and terms, and a track record of resolving complaints. A high trust score reflects a combination of these.
No. This ranking is informational only and is not investment advice or a recommendation. Always do your own research and verify licensing directly with the regulator before depositing funds.
Scores are recalculated automatically as licenses, reviews, complaints and registry data change, and this page reflects the latest scores each time it loads.
This list is not investment advice. Rankings reflect Finawake trust scores at the time of viewing and are updated as new regulatory, security and user-outcome data arrives. Trust scores are informational and do not guarantee a DeFi protocol’s future conduct. Trading forex, CFDs and crypto carries high risk. Always verify a DeFi protocol’s licensing directly with the relevant regulator and do your own research before depositing funds. See our full disclaimer.